View 4

This page talks about the benefit to “the States” whereupon the Native Americans are removed. Already in this treaty on removal, discussions about financial benefits to land are core to the thoughts of those working on it. Fear over disunion over which state gets what is more valued than morality, Native Americans, or those who will undergo the process of removal. A small mention of assimilation for Native Americans staying behind, seems to be undercut by a lack of further explanation. If this is an option, why remove Native Americans at all? While it is bad to be assimilated, it is preferable over removal and death. Well, this is a throw away line for those in the time opposed to removal. Those actually there, removing Native Americans, are doubtfully going to apply for assimilation for a single family. Likely, as we know, a Native American protesting removal would be met with extreme violence. This page of the treaty also details the “Cherokee perspective,” and in doing so summarizes an ethnic group full of diversity of opinion into one, homogenous being. This leads to dehumanization and an easy excuse to follow one way of doing things, by gaining the approval of one Native American and claiming you have the approval of all.